Easeman v Ford

Easeman v Ford

The defendant published serious, false, and defamatory statements about the claimant as part of a campaign of online vilification, causing significant reputational and financial harm. The claimant is entitled to the maximum summary damages of £10,000, a declaration of falsity, and an injunction restraining further publication. Costs are summarily assessed in the claimant's favour.

Parties
Claimant: Laurence Easeman; Defendant: Adam Ford
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
29 June 2016
Procedural Posture
Civil Libel / Assessment of Damages Following Default Judgment
Outcome
Judgment for the claimant
Legal Topics
Libel, Damages, Summary Relief, Injunctions
Defamation Tort Libel Damages Summary Relief Injunctions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Laurence Easeman

Claimant

Adam Ford

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Civil Libel / Assessment of Damages Following Default Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the statements published by the defendant were false and defamatory
  2. 2 Whether the claimant is entitled to summary relief under section 9 of the Defamation Act 1996
  3. 3 Assessment of damages including general, aggravated, and special damages

Ratio Decidendi

The defendant published serious, false, and defamatory statements about the claimant as part of a campaign of online vilification, causing significant reputational and financial harm. The claimant is entitled to the maximum summary damages of £10,000, a declaration of falsity, and an injunction restraining further publication. Costs are summarily assessed in the claimant's favour.

Court Disposition

Judgment for the claimant

Orders

  • Declaration that the statements were false and defamatory
  • Damages awarded in the sum of £10,000