Reed, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1471 (29 October 2025)
The extended sentence as originally imposed was unlawful because no single custodial term for a specified offence reached four years, as required by statute. The proper approach is to aggregate the offending into a single sentence for the lead offence, with all other sentences running concurrently, and to ensure the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 1471
- Parties
- Respondent: Rex; Applicant: Adam Reed
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 29 October 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Extended Sentences, Dangerous Offenders, Sentencing Guidelines, Totality Principle, Appeal Against Sentence
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Respondent
Adam Reed
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the imposition of an extended sentence was lawful under the Sentencing Code 2020
- 2 Whether the assault occasioning actual bodily harm was wrongly categorised under sentencing guidelines
- 3 Whether the overall sentence was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
The extended sentence as originally imposed was unlawful because no single custodial term for a specified offence reached four years, as required by statute. The proper approach is to aggregate the offending into a single sentence for the lead offence, with all other sentences running concurrently, and to ensure the total sentence is just and proportionate. The applicant is a dangerous offender and an extended sentence is appropriate, but the total custodial term should be five years with a two-year extended licence period.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sentence of 27 months for assault occasioning actual bodily harm quashed and substituted with 18 months' imprisonment.
- Sentence of three years nine months for false imprisonment quashed and substituted with five years' imprisonment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment