Adam Royle & Ors v R
The assistance provided by Royle was modest and occurred in the context of each defendant seeking to blame the other. The sentencing judge's reduction of approximately 11% was within the proper range of discretion and adequately reflected the assistance and risk. There was no error of law or principle justifying appellate intervention.
- Parties
- Applicant: Adam Royle; Applicant: AJC; Applicant: BCQ; Respondent: The King
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 18 June 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Sentence Reduction, Assistance to Law Enforcement, Informers, Open Justice, Statutory and Common Law Procedures
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adam Royle
Applicant
AJC
Applicant
BCQ
Applicant
The King
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 What principles govern sentence reduction for offenders who assist law enforcement?
- 2 What is the appropriate extent of reduction for such assistance?
- 3 What procedural requirements apply to the court's explanation of sentence reduction, especially under the text procedure?
Ratio Decidendi
The assistance provided by Royle was modest and occurred in the context of each defendant seeking to blame the other. The sentencing judge's reduction of approximately 11% was within the proper range of discretion and adequately reflected the assistance and risk. There was no error of law or principle justifying appellate intervention.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Orders
- Application for leave to appeal against sentence refused for Adam Royle.
- Applications of AJC and BCQ determined in closed judgments.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment