London Borough of Southwark v Adatola Erekin [2003] EWHC 1765 (Ch) (24 June 2003)

London Borough of Southwark v Adatola Erekin [2003] EWHC 1765 (Ch) (24 June 2003)

The appellate court found no error in the trial judge's exercise of discretion; the judge considered all relevant factors, including the defendant's fraud and the needs of her children, and did not exceed the ambit of reasonable disagreement in refusing the possession order.

Citation
[2003] EWHC 1765 (Ch)
Parties
Claimant: London Borough of Southwark; Defendant: Adatola Erekin
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Refusal of Possession Order
Outcome
Appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Possession Proceedings, Fraudulent Housing Applications, Judicial Discretion, Appeals Process
Housing Law Civil Procedure Possession Proceedings Fraudulent Housing Applications Judicial Discretion Appeals Process

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

London Borough of Southwark

Claimant

Adatola Erekin

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment on Appeal From Refusal of Possession Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the trial judge erred in refusing to grant a possession order despite admitted fraud by the defendant
  2. 2 Whether the judge failed to consider the pressure on the claimant's housing stock

Ratio Decidendi

The appellate court found no error in the trial judge's exercise of discretion; the judge considered all relevant factors, including the defendant's fraud and the needs of her children, and did not exceed the ambit of reasonable disagreement in refusing the possession order.

Court Disposition

Appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Appeal dismissed; refusal of possession order upheld