London Borough of Southwark v Adatola Erekin

London Borough of Southwark v Adatola Erekin

The judge did not exceed the generous ambit of discretion; all relevant factors, including fraud and housing stock pressure, were considered, and it was not unreasonable to refuse a possession order.

Parties
Claimant: London Borough of Southwark; Defendant: Adatola Erekin
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 June 2003
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Possession Order, Fraudulent Application, Judicial Discretion, Homelessness Legislation
Housing Law Civil Procedure Possession Order Fraudulent Application Judicial Discretion Homelessness Legislation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

London Borough of Southwark

Claimant

Adatola Erekin

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Appeal / Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the council discharged the onus to justify a possession order
  2. 2 Whether the judge failed to consider pressure on housing stock
  3. 3 Whether the judge exercised discretion within the proper ambit

Ratio Decidendi

The judge did not exceed the generous ambit of discretion; all relevant factors, including fraud and housing stock pressure, were considered, and it was not unreasonable to refuse a possession order.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • The appeal is dismissed.
  • No order as to costs against the council.