Bresa, R. v

Bresa, R. v

The judge's direction under Section 34 was materially flawed, failing to properly balance privilege, defendant's rights, and the requirement that the jury be sure silence was not merely due to legal advice. The conviction was unsafe due to the misdirection.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Adem Bresa
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
26 May 2005
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Conviction quashed; retrial ordered.
Legal Topics
Adverse Inference From Silence, Section 34 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994, Legal Professional Privilege, Self Defence, Judicial Directions
Criminal Law Adverse Inference From Silence Section 34 Criminal Justice and Public Order Act 1994 Legal Professional Privilege Self Defence Judicial Directions

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 5 Authorities cited 11 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Adem Bresa

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the judge's direction under Section 34 regarding adverse inference from silence was correct
  2. 2 Whether the appellant's conviction was safe given the misdirection
  3. 3 Appropriateness of the deportation recommendation

Ratio Decidendi

The judge's direction under Section 34 was materially flawed, failing to properly balance privilege, defendant's rights, and the requirement that the jury be sure silence was not merely due to legal advice. The conviction was unsafe due to the misdirection.

Court Disposition

Conviction quashed; retrial ordered.

Orders

  • Retrial ordered
  • Conviction quashed