ADG & Anor, R. v [2023] EWCA Crim 1309 (08 November 2023)
The trial judge misdirected the jury by requiring proof of compulsion for the section 45 defence for those under 18, which is not a statutory requirement. This added an extra burden on the defence, rendering the convictions unsafe.
- Citation
- [2023] EWCA Crim 1309
- Parties
- Appellant: ADG; Appellant: BIJ; Respondent: Rex
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 08 November 2023
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; convictions quashed; no retrial ordered
- Legal Topics
- Modern Slavery, Youth Justice, Jury Directions, Defences for Children, Drug Offences
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
ADG
Appellant
BIJ
Appellant
Rex
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge misdirected the jury by requiring proof of 'compulsion' for the section 45 Modern Slavery Act 2015 defence for defendants under 18
- 2 Whether the failure to direct the jury on 'relevant exploitation' rendered the conviction unsafe
Ratio Decidendi
The trial judge misdirected the jury by requiring proof of compulsion for the section 45 defence for those under 18, which is not a statutory requirement. This added an extra burden on the defence, rendering the convictions unsafe.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; convictions quashed; no retrial ordered
Orders
- Convictions for conspiracy to supply class A drugs quashed for both appellants
- No retrial to be ordered
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment