Rashid Naseer v Adil Farooq Raja

Rashid Naseer v Adil Farooq Raja

The Defendant's publications caused serious harm to the Claimant's reputation in the UK, and the Defendant failed to establish a reasonable belief in the public interest defence under s4 Defamation Act 2013 for all but one publication; the Claimant is entitled to damages, injunction, and summary of judgment.

Parties
Claimant: Rashid Naseer; Defendant: Adil Farooq Raja
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 September 2025
Procedural Posture
Defamation (libel) / Final Judgment After Trial
Outcome
Claim for defamation succeeds in respect of eight publications; Defendant liable.
Legal Topics
Libel, Serious Harm, Public Interest Defence, Damages, Injunction, Summary of Judgment

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 28 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rashid Naseer

Claimant

Adil Farooq Raja

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Defamation (libel) / Final Judgment After Trial

  1. 1 Whether the publications caused or were likely to cause serious harm to the Claimant's reputation under s1 Defamation Act 2013
  2. 2 Whether the Defendant had a defence under s4 Defamation Act 2013 (public interest)
  3. 3 Measure of damages

Ratio Decidendi

The Defendant's publications caused serious harm to the Claimant's reputation in the UK, and the Defendant failed to establish a reasonable belief in the public interest defence under s4 Defamation Act 2013 for all but one publication; the Claimant is entitled to damages, injunction, and summary of judgment.

Court Disposition

Claim for defamation succeeds in respect of eight publications; Defendant liable.

Orders

  • Defendant to pay Claimant £50,000 in damages
  • Defendant restrained by injunction from repeating same or similar libels