Nursing and Midwifery Council, R (on the application of) v Adina [2011] EWHC 156 (Admin) (20 January 2011)

Nursing and Midwifery Council, R (on the application of) v Adina [2011] EWHC 156 (Admin) (20 January 2011)

Given the seriousness of the allegations, the necessity for public protection, the scheduled substantive hearing, and the respondent's lack of cooperation, the justification for maintaining the suspension remains valid despite delay.

Citation
[2011] EWHC 156 (Admin)
Parties
Claimant: Nursing and Midwifery Council; Defendant: Adina
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
20 January 2011
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Interim Suspension Order
Outcome
application granted
Legal Topics
Interim Suspension Order, Fitness to Practise, Public Protection, Delay in Proceedings
Administrative Law Professional Regulation Interim Suspension Order Fitness to Practise Public Protection Delay in Proceedings

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 1
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Nursing and Midwifery Council

Claimant

Adina

Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Application for Extension of Interim Suspension Order

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether to grant an extension of the interim suspension order against the respondent under Article 31 of the Nursing and Midwifery Order 2001

Ratio Decidendi

Given the seriousness of the allegations, the necessity for public protection, the scheduled substantive hearing, and the respondent's lack of cooperation, the justification for maintaining the suspension remains valid despite delay.

Court Disposition

application granted

Orders

  • Interim Suspension Order extended for a further six months or until 19 July 2011, whichever is sooner.
  • No order as to costs.