Hussain, R (on the application of) v King Edward VII Hospital
The proposed new evidence failed the first and third limbs of the Ladd v Marshall test: it could have been obtained with reasonable diligence before trial, and it was not apparently credible. Therefore, it could not be admitted and the appeal was dismissed.
- Parties
- Claimant/appellant: Hani Hussain; Defendant/respondent: King Edward VII Hospital
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal (medical Negligence) / Appeal From High Court Judgment; Application to Adduce Fresh Evidence on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed; application to adduce fresh evidence refused
- Legal Topics
- Admission of Fresh Evidence on Appeal, Res Ipsa Loquitur, Burden of Proof, Medical Expert Evidence
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hani Hussain
Claimant/appellant
King Edward VII Hospital
Defendant/respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal (medical Negligence) / Appeal From High Court Judgment; Application to Adduce Fresh Evidence on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether fresh evidence should be admitted on appeal under the Ladd v Marshall criteria
- 2 Whether the trial judge erred in finding no prima facie case of negligence by the hospital
- 3 Whether the new evidence would have affected the outcome
Ratio Decidendi
The proposed new evidence failed the first and third limbs of the Ladd v Marshall test: it could have been obtained with reasonable diligence before trial, and it was not apparently credible. Therefore, it could not be admitted and the appeal was dismissed.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed; application to adduce fresh evidence refused
Orders
- Application to adduce fresh evidence refused
- Appeal dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment