R v Adnan Khan
The sentence was not manifestly excessive given the totality of offending, but the duration of the Sexual Harm Prevention Order was excessive and reduced to 10 years.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Adnan Khan
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 November 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- appeal allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Sexual Offences, Harassment, Sentencing, Sexual Harm Prevention Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 3 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Adnan Khan
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive
- 2 Appropriate categorisation of harm and culpability under sentencing guidelines
- 3 Justification for the duration of the Sexual Harm Prevention Order
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence was not manifestly excessive given the totality of offending, but the duration of the Sexual Harm Prevention Order was excessive and reduced to 10 years.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed in part
Orders
- Sexual Harm Prevention Order duration reduced from 20 years to 10 years
- Notification period set at 10 years
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment