HM Attorney General v Adrian Badita
Mr Badita has habitually and persistently instituted vexatious civil proceedings and applications without reasonable ground, conducted them in an abusive and threatening manner, ignored court orders, and will continue unless restrained. The statutory test under s.42(1) Senior Courts Act 1981 is satisfied and a Civil Proceedings Order is warranted.
- Parties
- Claimant: HM Attorney General; Defendant: Adrian Badita
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 June 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Application for Civil Proceedings Order / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Civil Proceedings Order granted against Adrian Badita
- Legal Topics
- Vexatious Litigation, Civil Restraint Orders, Abuse of Process
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
HM Attorney General
Claimant
Adrian Badita
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Application for Civil Proceedings Order / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Adrian Badita has habitually and persistently instituted vexatious civil proceedings without reasonable ground
- 2 Whether the conduct of Mr Badita warrants the imposition of a Civil Proceedings Order under s.42(1) of the Senior Courts Act 1981
Ratio Decidendi
Mr Badita has habitually and persistently instituted vexatious civil proceedings and applications without reasonable ground, conducted them in an abusive and threatening manner, ignored court orders, and will continue unless restrained. The statutory test under s.42(1) Senior Courts Act 1981 is satisfied and a Civil Proceedings Order is warranted.
Court Disposition
Civil Proceedings Order granted against Adrian Badita
Orders
- Adrian Badita is prohibited from instituting any civil proceedings in any Court or Tribunal without permission of the High Court.
- Adrian Badita is prohibited from continuing any civil proceedings instituted by him in any Court or Tribunal before the making of the Order without permission of the High Court.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment