Gallagher, R. v
It is not arguable that the jury's verdicts were inconsistent; the conviction on count 1 is safe despite acquittals on counts 2, 3, and 4.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Applicant: Adrian Eamon Gallagher
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 January 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction
- Outcome
- application for leave to appeal conviction refused
- Legal Topics
- Rape, Inconsistent Verdicts, Jury Directions, Credibility of Complainant
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 1 Party arguments 2
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Adrian Eamon Gallagher
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Conviction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the jury's verdicts were inconsistent and rendered the conviction unsafe
Ratio Decidendi
It is not arguable that the jury's verdicts were inconsistent; the conviction on count 1 is safe despite acquittals on counts 2, 3, and 4.
Court Disposition
application for leave to appeal conviction refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment