Angel v Stainton & Anor [2006] EWHC 637 (QB) (28 March 2006)
The appropriate compensation for the libel, considering the gravity of the allegation and limited publication, is £40,000, reduced by 40% to £24,000 due to the defendants' delayed and grudging offer of amends and aggravating conduct, but with some mitigation for eventually following the statutory procedure.
- Citation
- [2006] EWHC 637 (QB)
- Parties
- Claimant: Norman Angel; Defendant: Adrian Stainton; Defendant: Repaircraft PLC
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 March 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Libel Action (defamation) / Assessment of Compensation Following Offer of Amends Under Defamation Act 1996
- Outcome
- Claim allowed; compensation awarded to claimant.
- Legal Topics
- Libel, Offer of Amends, Damages Assessment, Aggravated Damages
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Norman Angel
Claimant
Adrian Stainton
Defendant
Repaircraft PLC
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Libel Action (defamation) / Assessment of Compensation Following Offer of Amends Under Defamation Act 1996
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate amount of compensation for the libel under the offer of amends procedure?
- 2 To what extent should the compensation be mitigated by the defendants' conduct, including the timing and nature of the offer of amends and subsequent correspondence?
Ratio Decidendi
The appropriate compensation for the libel, considering the gravity of the allegation and limited publication, is £40,000, reduced by 40% to £24,000 due to the defendants' delayed and grudging offer of amends and aggravating conduct, but with some mitigation for eventually following the statutory procedure.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed; compensation awarded to claimant.
Orders
- Defendants to pay £24,000 to claimant as compensation for libel.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment