Thomas & Anor v Wade & Anor (Alteration and rectification - Schedule 4 Land Registration Act 2002 - "correction of a mistake" - previously determined boundary - adverse possession of previously unregistered land) [2026] UKFTT 17 (PC) (19 December 2025)
The determined boundary entry made in 2017 was a mistake because it included land and structures to which the Respondents' title had been limitation-barred by adverse possession since 1988. The Applicants had exclusive possession and use of the staircase structure and associated land for over 22 years prior to...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2026] UKFTT 17 (PC)
- Parties
- Applicant: Adrian Wyn Thomas; Applicant: Moina Winifred Thomas; Respondent: John Timothy Wade; Respondent: Michelle Lorraine Wade
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 19 December 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Land Registration Alteration and Rectification / Final Determination After Hearing
- Outcome
- Application for rectification granted; determined boundary entries cancelled; titles revert to general boundaries only.
- Legal Topics
- Alteration and Rectification, Schedule 4 Land Registration Act 2002, Correction of a Mistake, Determined Boundary, Adverse Possession, Unregistered Land
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Adrian Wyn Thomas
Applicant
Moina Winifred Thomas
Applicant
John Timothy Wade
Respondent
Michelle Lorraine Wade
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Land Registration Alteration and Rectification / Final Determination After Hearing
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the determined boundary entry made in 2017 was a mistake under Schedule 4 Land Registration Act 2002
- 2 Whether the Applicants acquired title to the disputed land by adverse possession prior to first registration of Respondents' title
- 3 Whether rectification of the register should be ordered to remove the determined boundary entry
Ratio Decidendi
The determined boundary entry made in 2017 was a mistake because it included land and structures to which the Respondents' title had been limitation-barred by adverse possession since 1988. The Applicants had exclusive possession and use of the staircase structure and associated land for over 22 years prior to Respondents' first registration. Rectification must be granted to remove the determined boundary entry, reverting the titles to general boundaries only.
Court Disposition
Application for rectification granted; determined boundary entries cancelled; titles revert to general boundaries only.
Orders
- Registrar to cancel determined boundary entries on both titles NK121816 and NK402000.
- Registrar to reject any future determined boundary application by the Applicants unless agreed by Respondents or Tribunal consents upon application.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment