R v Adris Mohammed
There was sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude the applicant intended to kill the deceased by tying him up and leaving him, and the judge's directions on mens rea were adequate. The minimum term imposed was not manifestly excessive given the aggravating factors.
- Parties
- Prosecutor: Rex; Applicant: Adris Mohammed
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 September 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- Application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Murder, Burglary, Fraud, Appeal Against Conviction, Appeal Against Sentence, Mens Rea, Sentencing Principles
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecutor
Adris Mohammed
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether there was sufficient evidence for the jury to find the requisite mens rea for murder
- 2 Whether the judge's directions on mens rea for murder were adequate
- 3 Whether the minimum term imposed was manifestly excessive
Ratio Decidendi
There was sufficient evidence for a reasonable jury to conclude the applicant intended to kill the deceased by tying him up and leaving him, and the judge's directions on mens rea were adequate. The minimum term imposed was not manifestly excessive given the aggravating factors.
Court Disposition
Application for leave to appeal against conviction and sentence refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal against conviction refused
- Permission to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment