Graham & Ors v Mayrick [2006] EWCA Civ 840 (01 June 2006)
Permission to appeal granted because the two points raised—requirement to identify the dispossessed paper title owner in adverse possession, and the judge's handling of evidence and findings on exclusive possession—raise arguable points of principle and fairness, particularly as the second point arose only at the hearing and was not previously considered.
- Citation
- [2006] EWCA Civ 840
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Sir Alexander Michael Graham & Ors; Defendant/appellant: Brian Mayrick
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- permission to appeal granted; stay of execution granted
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Appeals, Summary Judgment (cpr Part 24)
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sir Alexander Michael Graham & Ors
Claimant/respondent
Brian Mayrick
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether adverse possession requires identification of the paper title owner dispossessed
- 2 Whether the judge erred in finding the defendant had not established 12 years' adverse possession as tenant of someone other than the claimants
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal granted because the two points raised—requirement to identify the dispossessed paper title owner in adverse possession, and the judge's handling of evidence and findings on exclusive possession—raise arguable points of principle and fairness, particularly as the second point arose only at the hearing and was not previously considered.
Court Disposition
permission to appeal granted; stay of execution granted
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Stay of execution granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment