Graham & Ors v Mayrick
Permission to appeal is granted because the points raised are arguable, particularly as the second point arose only at the hearing before Hart J and had not previously been taken. The first point may raise a question of general importance regarding the requirements for adverse possession.
- Parties
- Claimant/respondent: Sir Alexander Michael Graham & Others; Defendant/appellant: Brian Mayrick
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 June 2006
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
- Outcome
- permission to appeal granted; stay of execution granted
- Legal Topics
- Adverse Possession, Appeals, Summary Judgment, Title to Land
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Sir Alexander Michael Graham & Others
Claimant/respondent
Brian Mayrick
Defendant/appellant
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Renewed Application for Permission to Appeal (second Appeal)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether claimants must prove identity of dispossessed paper title owner in adverse possession claims
- 2 Whether the judge erred in finding the defendant had not established 12 years' adverse possession
- 3 Whether the judge improperly refused to admit further evidence on exclusive possession
Ratio Decidendi
Permission to appeal is granted because the points raised are arguable, particularly as the second point arose only at the hearing before Hart J and had not previously been taken. The first point may raise a question of general importance regarding the requirements for adverse possession.
Court Disposition
permission to appeal granted; stay of execution granted
Orders
- Permission to appeal granted
- Stay of execution granted
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment