Smith v ADVFN Plc & Ors (Rev 1)
All claims are struck out or dismissed as wholly without merit due to lack of evidence of substantial publication, seriousness, or damage, and the existence of strong defences. Mr Smith's conduct constitutes persistent abuse of process, justifying an extended civil restraint order.
- Parties
- Claimant: Nigel Smith; Defendant: ADVFN Plc and others
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 13 December 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Post Appeal, Show Cause Hearing on Strike Out and Civil Restraint Order
- Outcome
- Claims struck out or dismissed; extended civil restraint order imposed against Mr Smith.
- Legal Topics
- Internet Defamation, Abuse of Process, Civil Restraint Orders, Qualified Privilege, Fair Comment, Judicial Immunity
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Nigel Smith
Claimant
ADVFN Plc and others
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Post Appeal, Show Cause Hearing on Strike Out and Civil Restraint Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claims brought by Mr Smith should be struck out or be the subject of summary judgment for lack of merit
- 2 Whether Mr Smith should be made subject to a civil restraint order for persistently issuing meritless claims
Ratio Decidendi
All claims are struck out or dismissed as wholly without merit due to lack of evidence of substantial publication, seriousness, or damage, and the existence of strong defences. Mr Smith's conduct constitutes persistent abuse of process, justifying an extended civil restraint order.
Court Disposition
Claims struck out or dismissed; extended civil restraint order imposed against Mr Smith.
Orders
- All claims in Schedule A (except HQ07X03107) are struck out or dismissed as wholly without merit.
- Mr Smith is made subject to an extended civil restraint order under Practice Direction 3C para 3.1.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment