Hamsard One Thousand and Forty-Three Limited v AE Insurance Brokers Limited
AE did not breach its duties as insurance broker; Fusion waived disclosure of director's prior failed companies; administration status of tenant was disclosed; loss of rent cover was not required or requested; accidental damage cover exclusion was clear and adequately communicated; no causation or recoverable loss proven.
- Parties
- Claimant: Hamsard One Thousand and Forty-Three Limited; Defendant: AE Insurance Brokers Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 11 October 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Court Claim / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Broker's Duties, Non Disclosure, Waiver, Causation, Quantum
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Hamsard One Thousand and Forty-Three Limited
Claimant
AE Insurance Brokers Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Court Claim / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether AE breached its duties as insurance broker by failing to disclose director's association with prior failed companies
- 2 Whether AE breached its duties by failing to disclose tenant's administration status
- 3 Whether AE breached its duties by failing to place loss of rent cover
Ratio Decidendi
AE did not breach its duties as insurance broker; Fusion waived disclosure of director's prior failed companies; administration status of tenant was disclosed; loss of rent cover was not required or requested; accidental damage cover exclusion was clear and adequately communicated; no causation or recoverable loss proven.
Court Disposition
Claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment