Rig Holdings LP v Aeroflex Test Solutions Ltd
The computations required by clause 13.5(B) and (C) of the Tax Deed must be performed on the basis that the Company's accounting period was a 12 month period to 31 December. The change to an 18 month period is to be ignored for the purpose of clause 13. As a result, the claim fails because the profit calculation for the last 5 months of 2003 is not justified under the contract.
- Parties
- Claimant: RIG Holdings L. P.; Defendant: Aeroflex Test Solutions Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 25 June 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- claim dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Assignment of Rights, Corporation Tax Computation, Breach of Contract, Interpretation of Contractual Clauses
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
RIG Holdings L. P.
Claimant
Aeroflex Test Solutions Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimant is entitled to payment under clause 13 of the Tax Deed
- 2 Whether the defendant is barred from disputing the claim by operation of clause 2.6 of the SPA
- 3 Proper method for computation of losses and profits for relevant periods under the Tax Deed
Ratio Decidendi
The computations required by clause 13.5(B) and (C) of the Tax Deed must be performed on the basis that the Company's accounting period was a 12 month period to 31 December. The change to an 18 month period is to be ignored for the purpose of clause 13. As a result, the claim fails because the profit calculation for the last 5 months of 2003 is not justified under the contract.
Court Disposition
claim dismissed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment