Aerospace Tolling Ltd v Aerospace Technical Ltd [2012] EWHC 1086 (QB) (28 November 2012)
Bankruptcy does not affect the obligation to pay a court-imposed fine for contempt; the contemnor failed to comply with the suspended committal order, and there are no grounds to delay enforcement.
- Citation
- [2012] EWHC 1086
- Parties
- Claimant: Aerospace Tolling Ltd; Defendant: Aerospace Technical Ltd
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 November 2012
- Procedural Posture
- Contempt of Court Application / Enforcement of Committal Order
- Outcome
- Committal to prison for 28 days, with release after 14 days in accordance with relevant provisions.
- Legal Topics
- Enforcement of Court Orders, Suspended Committal, Bankruptcy and Fines
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aerospace Tolling Ltd
Claimant
Aerospace Technical Ltd
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Contempt of Court Application / Enforcement of Committal Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the suspended committal order should be enforced due to non-payment of fine
- 2 Effect of bankruptcy on court-imposed fines
Ratio Decidendi
Bankruptcy does not affect the obligation to pay a court-imposed fine for contempt; the contemnor failed to comply with the suspended committal order, and there are no grounds to delay enforcement.
Court Disposition
Committal to prison for 28 days, with release after 14 days in accordance with relevant provisions.
Orders
- Warrant to be issued for Mr Paulin's arrest.
- Mr Paulin to be committed to prison for 28 days, to serve 14 days before possible release.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment