National Museums and Galleries on Merseyside (Trustees of) v AEW Architects and Designers Ltd
AEW was negligent and in breach of contract in failing to properly design, coordinate, and inspect the steps, seats, terraces, and ceilings, including failing to specify adequate tolerances, gaps, and reinforcement cover, and in instructing an unacceptable plinth solution without client approval. The Contractor was liable for inadequate reinforcement cover but not for geometry or gap issues. The Museum was entitled to recover the reasonable cost of remedial works, associated professional and management costs, and an indemnity for certain delay-related losses. Contribution was apportioned at 25% to the Contractor for common damage relating to reinforcement cover.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Board of Trustees of National Museums and Galleries on Merseyside; Defendant: AEW Architects and Designers Limited; Third Party: PIHL UK Limited and Galliford Try Construction Limited (trading together in partnership as a Joint Venture 'PIHL Galliford Try JV')
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 July 2013
- Procedural Posture
- Civil (construction/professional Negligence) / Judgment on Liability, Contribution, and Quantum for Steps and Seats Claim
- Outcome
- Judgment for the Claimant against AEW; contribution judgment for AEW against the Contractor; indemnity declarations for certain losses; quantum determined for steps and seats claim.
- Legal Topics
- Architects' Duties, Design Coordination, Construction Defects, Damages Assessment, Contribution Between Tortfeasors
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Board of Trustees of National Museums and Galleries on Merseyside
Claimant
AEW Architects and Designers Limited
Defendant
PIHL UK Limited and Galliford Try Construction Limited (trading together in partnership as a Joint Venture 'PIHL Galliford Try JV')
Third Party
Procedural Posture
Civil (construction/professional Negligence) / Judgment on Liability, Contribution, and Quantum for Steps and Seats Claim
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether AEW Architects breached contractual and tortious duties in design and coordination of steps, seats, terraces, and ceilings
- 2 Whether the Contractor was liable for design or workmanship defects
- 3 Appropriate quantum of damages and apportionment of contribution
Ratio Decidendi
AEW was negligent and in breach of contract in failing to properly design, coordinate, and inspect the steps, seats, terraces, and ceilings, including failing to specify adequate tolerances, gaps, and reinforcement cover, and in instructing an unacceptable plinth solution without client approval. The Contractor was liable for inadequate reinforcement cover but not for geometry or gap issues. The Museum was entitled to recover the reasonable cost of remedial works, associated professional and management costs, and an indemnity for certain delay-related losses. Contribution was apportioned at 25% to the Contractor for common damage relating to reinforcement cover.
Court Disposition
Judgment for the Claimant against AEW; contribution judgment for AEW against the Contractor; indemnity declarations for certain losses; quantum determined for steps and seats claim.
Orders
- AEW to pay the Museum £1,127,870.40 in damages for steps, seats, and terraces claim.
- AEW to indemnify the Museum against damages, losses, expenses, or costs payable to the Contractor for security costs and prolongation loss and expense, to the extent caused by AEW's breaches.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment