AF v BG [2009] EWCA Civ 757 (21 July 2009)
The offer letter was a valid Part 36 offer relating to the entire proceedings, including both the original claim and the proposed counterclaim, and upon acceptance would have the effect that the entire proceedings would be stayed and the Applicant would be liable for the Respondent's costs of both the counterclaim...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2009] EWCA Civ 757
- Parties
- Applicant: AF; Respondent: BG
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 21 July 2009
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Application Regarding Settlement Under CPR Part 36
- Outcome
- Application dismissed; proceedings to continue.
- Legal Topics
- Part 36 Offers, Settlement, Costs Consequences, Counterclaims, Interpretation of CPR
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AF
Applicant
BG
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Civil Appeal / Interlocutory Application Regarding Settlement Under CPR Part 36
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the offer letter constituted a valid Part 36 offer under the Civil Procedure Rules
- 2 Whether the offer related to the whole proceedings, including both claim and proposed counterclaim
- 3 Whether the costs consequences of acceptance under Part 36 applied to both claim and counterclaim
Ratio Decidendi
The offer letter was a valid Part 36 offer relating to the entire proceedings, including both the original claim and the proposed counterclaim, and upon acceptance would have the effect that the entire proceedings would be stayed and the Applicant would be liable for the Respondent's costs of both the counterclaim and defending the original claim.
Court Disposition
Application dismissed; proceedings to continue.
Orders
- No binding compromise found; stay of proceedings not continued; oral hearing to be relisted.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment