EE Limited & Anor v Affinity Water Limited
The Tribunal determined that the appropriate annual consideration for the new lease is £3,300, reflecting the market value of the Code rights for a water tower site, with a 10% uplift for the benefit of a flexible break clause. Compensation for professional fees is set at £7,500, covering reasonable legal and valuation expenses incurred by the respondent. The Tribunal found that the pattern of values established in previous decisions provides a reliable guide and that future facilities management costs should be claimed as compensation if and when incurred.
- Parties
- Claimant: EE Limited; Claimant: Hutchison 3G UK Limited; Respondent: Affinity Water Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 January 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Reference Under Electronic Communications Code / Determination of Financial Terms for New Agreement
- Outcome
- Application allowed in part
- Legal Topics
- Electronic Communications Code, Consideration and Compensation, Valuation of Code Rights, Professional Fees Recovery
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
EE Limited
Claimant
Hutchison 3G UK Limited
Claimant
Affinity Water Limited
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Reference Under Electronic Communications Code / Determination of Financial Terms for New Agreement
Legal Issues
- 1 What is the appropriate annual consideration payable under a new Code agreement for a telecommunications site on a water tower?
- 2 What compensation is payable for professional fees incurred by the site provider before the order conferring Code rights?
Ratio Decidendi
The Tribunal determined that the appropriate annual consideration for the new lease is £3,300, reflecting the market value of the Code rights for a water tower site, with a 10% uplift for the benefit of a flexible break clause. Compensation for professional fees is set at £7,500, covering reasonable legal and valuation expenses incurred by the respondent. The Tribunal found that the pattern of values established in previous decisions provides a reliable guide and that future facilities management costs should be claimed as compensation if and when incurred.
Court Disposition
Application allowed in part
Orders
- The subsisting Code agreement is terminated from a date to be agreed.
- The parties are ordered to enter into a new agreement on previously agreed terms at an annual rent of £3,300.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment