CXF, R (On the Application Of) v Central Bedfordshire Council NHS North Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group
Section 117 of the Mental Health Act 1983 does not apply to a patient who remains in the care and custody of the hospital during escorted day trips under section 17 leave; such a patient has not 'ceased to be detained' nor 'left hospital' within the meaning of section 117(1), and the services provided during these trips are not 'after-care services' but part of ongoing treatment.
- Parties
- Appellant/claimant: CXF (acting by his mother and litigation friend); First Respondent/defendant: Central Bedfordshire Council; Second Respondent/defendant: NHS North Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 20 December 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- After Care Services, Section 117 Mental Health Act 1983, Leave of Absence Under Section 17, Judicial Review, Duty to Fund Travel Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
CXF (acting by his mother and litigation friend)
Appellant/claimant
Central Bedfordshire Council
First Respondent/defendant
NHS North Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group
Second Respondent/defendant
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Does section 117 of the Mental Health Act 1983 apply to a patient granted leave of absence under section 17 for escorted day trips?
- 2 Do the services provided during such trips constitute 'after-care services' under section 117?
- 3 Is there a duty to fund the claimant's mother's travel costs under section 117?
Ratio Decidendi
Section 117 of the Mental Health Act 1983 does not apply to a patient who remains in the care and custody of the hospital during escorted day trips under section 17 leave; such a patient has not 'ceased to be detained' nor 'left hospital' within the meaning of section 117(1), and the services provided during these trips are not 'after-care services' but part of ongoing treatment.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Claim for judicial review dismissed
- No duty under section 117 to fund travel costs in these circumstances
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment