CXF, R (on the application of) v Central Bedfordshire Council & Anor

The s.117 duty to provide after-care services is not triggered by leave of absence under s.17 unless the patient has actually ceased to be detained and left hospital; in this case, the claimant remained detained and admitted to hospital during escorted trips, so no duty arose.

Parties: Claimant: CXF (acting by his mother, his litigation friend); First Defendant: Central Bedfordshire Council; Second Defendant: North Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 15 September 2017
Procedural Posture: Judicial Review / Final Judgment
Outcome: claim dismissed
Legal Topics: After Care Services, Leave of Absence, Statutory Interpretation, Funding Obligations

Mental Health Law Public Law After Care Services Leave of Absence Statutory Interpretation Funding Obligations

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3

Parties

CXF (acting by his mother, his litigation friend)

Claimant

Central Bedfordshire Council

First Defendant

North Norfolk Clinical Commissioning Group

Second Defendant

Procedural Posture

Judicial Review / Final Judgment

Legal Issues

1 Whether s.117 Mental Health Act duty to provide after-care services is triggered when a patient is granted leave of absence under s.17.
2 Whether after-care services under s.117(6) may include funding for transport costs for the patient's mother.
3 Whether there is a duty to provide funding as an after-care service under s.117 on the facts.

Ratio Decidendi

Court Disposition

claim dismissed