UPL Europe Ltd & Anor v Agchemaccess Chemicals Ltd & Ors
The first and third defendants failed to engage with the claimants regarding expert evidence, did not respond to correspondence, and proceeded without proper engagement, justifying a costs order in favour of the claimants, subject to a modest reduction as the primary relief was not pursued.
- Parties
- Claimant: UPL Europe Limited; Claimant: UPL Deutschland GmbH; Defendant: Agchemaccess Chemicals Limited; Defendant: Grosvenor Chemicals Limited; Defendant: Mr Nicholas Gooch
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 November 2016
- Procedural Posture
- Civil / Costs Determination After Interlocutory Application
- Outcome
- Application for costs granted in part
- Legal Topics
- Expert Evidence, Costs, Case Management
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
UPL Europe Limited
Claimant
UPL Deutschland GmbH
Claimant
Agchemaccess Chemicals Limited
Defendant
Grosvenor Chemicals Limited
Defendant
Mr Nicholas Gooch
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil / Costs Determination After Interlocutory Application
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the claimants are entitled to costs of the application regarding expert evidence
- 2 Whether the defendants' conduct justified a costs order against them
Ratio Decidendi
The first and third defendants failed to engage with the claimants regarding expert evidence, did not respond to correspondence, and proceeded without proper engagement, justifying a costs order in favour of the claimants, subject to a modest reduction as the primary relief was not pursued.
Court Disposition
Application for costs granted in part
Orders
- First and third defendants to pay 85% of the claimants’ costs of the application on the standard basis, summarily assessed at £14,821.25.
- Claimants to lodge a draft order reflecting this determination.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment