AGCO Ltd. & Anor v Kellaway
The court held that, as a matter of substance, Mr Kellaway was made compulsorily redundant and did not retire at the request of the employer. The circumstances did not amount to voluntary redundancy, and it would be a misuse of language to describe them as such. Therefore, Mr Kellaway was not entitled to the benefit of rule 14(c)(iii) of the staff pension scheme.
- Parties
- Appellant: AGCO Limited & Anr; Respondent: Kellaway
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 10 July 2007
- Procedural Posture
- Appeal / Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed
- Legal Topics
- Redundancy, Pension Entitlement, Interpretation of Pension Scheme Rules, Voluntary Vs Compulsory Redundancy
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AGCO Limited & Anr
Appellant
Kellaway
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Appeal / Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether Mr Kellaway retired from service at the request of the employer within the meaning of rule 14(c)(iii) of the staff pension scheme
- 2 Whether the circumstances amounted to voluntary or compulsory redundancy for pension entitlement purposes
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that, as a matter of substance, Mr Kellaway was made compulsorily redundant and did not retire at the request of the employer. The circumstances did not amount to voluntary redundancy, and it would be a misuse of language to describe them as such. Therefore, Mr Kellaway was not entitled to the benefit of rule 14(c)(iii) of the staff pension scheme.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed
Orders
- The appeal is allowed. The court will hear counsel on the precise form of the order to give effect to the judgment.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment