Powell, R v
The sentence for aggravated burglary was unduly lenient due to misapplication of the sentencing guideline; the offence warranted a sentence at the top of category 2, moderated for personal mitigation and limited credit for guilty plea, resulting in an increased sentence of 6 years for count 1.
- Parties
- Prosecution: Regina; Offender: Samuel Clive Martin Powell
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 14 December 2017
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal / Attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988, Appellate Review of Sentence
- Outcome
- sentence increased
- Legal Topics
- Aggravated Burglary, Sentencing Guidelines, Unduly Lenient Sentence, Goodyear Indication, Attorney General's Reference
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Prosecution
Samuel Clive Martin Powell
Offender
Procedural Posture
Criminal / Attorney General's Reference Under S.36 Criminal Justice Act 1988, Appellate Review of Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Was the sentence for aggravated burglary unduly lenient?
- 2 Was the Sentencing Council's guideline correctly applied regarding categorisation?
- 3 Should the court depart from prosecuting counsel's concession on category in the context of a Goodyear indication?
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence for aggravated burglary was unduly lenient due to misapplication of the sentencing guideline; the offence warranted a sentence at the top of category 2, moderated for personal mitigation and limited credit for guilty plea, resulting in an increased sentence of 6 years for count 1.
Court Disposition
sentence increased
Orders
- Sentence for count 1 (aggravated burglary) increased to 6 years imprisonment.
- Sentence for count 2 (common assault) remains 4 months consecutive.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment