Brooks v AH Brooks & Co (a firm)
Service at the firm's address was not technically good service on Mr and Mrs Morris as they no longer carried on business there, but acknowledgment of service by solicitors authorised by Mrs Morris (and thus by all former partners) was effective and binding, waiving defects. The present partners were not liable as they were not partners at the relevant time; it was reasonable for them to participate in the proceedings due to the claimant's conduct, and they are entitled to their costs. Part 20 proceedings against former partners are dismissed except for the contractual indemnity claim against Mrs Morris.
- Parties
- Claimant: Trevor John Brooks; Defendant: AH Brooks & Co (a Firm); Third Party: Elizabeth Anne Winter Morris; Fourth Party: Paul Winter Morris; Fifth Party: Roger Brooks; Sixth Party: Judith Parkin (Executrix of the will of Stephen Short, Deceased)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 04 November 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Partnership/professional Negligence / Post Hearing Judgment on Service, Parties, and Costs
- Outcome
- Claim against present partners not pursued; acknowledgment of service effective on former partners; costs orders made; Part 20 proceedings dismissed except as to indemnity claim against Mrs Morris.
- Legal Topics
- Service of Process, Partnership Liability, Acknowledgment of Service, Costs Orders, Part 20 Proceedings
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Trevor John Brooks
Claimant
AH Brooks & Co (a Firm)
Defendant
Elizabeth Anne Winter Morris
Third Party
Paul Winter Morris
Fourth Party
Roger Brooks
Fifth Party
Judith Parkin (Executrix of the will of Stephen Short, Deceased)
Sixth Party
Procedural Posture
Civil Partnership/professional Negligence / Post Hearing Judgment on Service, Parties, and Costs
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether service of the claim form and particulars of claim was effective on former partners (Mr and Mrs Morris) of an unincorporated firm
- 2 Whether present partners (Mr Chiverton and Ms Williamson) are proper parties to the claim and liable for costs
- 3 Proper parties to acknowledgment of service in claims against partnerships
Ratio Decidendi
Service at the firm's address was not technically good service on Mr and Mrs Morris as they no longer carried on business there, but acknowledgment of service by solicitors authorised by Mrs Morris (and thus by all former partners) was effective and binding, waiving defects. The present partners were not liable as they were not partners at the relevant time; it was reasonable for them to participate in the proceedings due to the claimant's conduct, and they are entitled to their costs. Part 20 proceedings against former partners are dismissed except for the contractual indemnity claim against Mrs Morris.
Court Disposition
Claim against present partners not pursued; acknowledgment of service effective on former partners; costs orders made; Part 20 proceedings dismissed except as to indemnity claim against Mrs Morris.
Orders
- Claimant to pay costs of present partners (Mr Chiverton and Ms Williamson) on the standard basis, except as previously ordered for amendments to defence.
- Part 20 proceedings dismissed except for contractual indemnity claim against Mrs Morris.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment