AH Ltd & Anor, R. v [2021] EWCA Crim 359 (16 March 2021)
The House of Lords in R v Chargot expressly approved the decision in R v Davies, confirming that section 40 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 imposes a legal burden on the accused to prove reasonable practicability. This reverse burden is justified, necessary, and proportionate, and remains binding authority. The criticisms of Davies do not provide grounds for this court to depart from precedent.
- Citation
- [2021] EWCA Crim 359
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: AH Ltd; Appellant: Mr SJ
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 March 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Preparatory Hearing Ruling
- Outcome
- Permission to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Reverse Burden of Proof, Reasonable Practicability, Presumption of Innocence, Health and Safety at Work Act 1974, Section 40 HSWA, Corporate Criminal Liability
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
AH Ltd
Appellant
Mr SJ
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Preparatory Hearing Ruling
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether section 40 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 imposes a legal or evidential burden on the accused to prove reasonable practicability
- 2 Whether the reverse burden under section 40 is compatible with the presumption of innocence under Article 6(2) ECHR
- 3 Whether R v Davies was correctly decided and remains binding in light of subsequent case law and legislative changes
Ratio Decidendi
The House of Lords in R v Chargot expressly approved the decision in R v Davies, confirming that section 40 of the Health and Safety at Work Act 1974 imposes a legal burden on the accused to prove reasonable practicability. This reverse burden is justified, necessary, and proportionate, and remains binding authority. The criticisms of Davies do not provide grounds for this court to depart from precedent.
Court Disposition
Permission to appeal refused
Orders
- Permission to appeal from the ruling of Thornton J is refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment