The Government of Lithuania v AI
The appeal was dismissed on the basis that the combination of AI's personal circumstances as a trafficking victim, her need for ongoing support and treatment, her secure accommodation, and her assistance to UK police created exceptional and compelling circumstances. These outweighed the interests of justice in extradition under Article 8 ECHR, making extradition disproportionate.
- Parties
- Claimant: The Government of Lithuania; Defendant: AI
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 28 July 2010
- Procedural Posture
- Extradition Appeal / Appeal From Discharge of Extradition Order
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Extradition, European Arrest Warrant, Article 3 ECHR, Article 8 ECHR, Trafficking, Victims' Rights
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
The Government of Lithuania
Claimant
AI
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Extradition Appeal / Appeal From Discharge of Extradition Order
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether extradition of AI to Lithuania would breach Article 3 ECHR due to risk of inhuman or degrading treatment
- 2 Whether extradition would disproportionately interfere with AI's Article 8 ECHR rights given her circumstances as a trafficking victim and her assistance to UK police
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was dismissed on the basis that the combination of AI's personal circumstances as a trafficking victim, her need for ongoing support and treatment, her secure accommodation, and her assistance to UK police created exceptional and compelling circumstances. These outweighed the interests of justice in extradition under Article 8 ECHR, making extradition disproportionate.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal dismissed; extradition not ordered
- Order for assessment under legal aid regulations granted to respondent's counsel
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment