R v AIB

R v AIB

The judge erred in determining that the text did not assist the appellant; the appellant had provided significant assistance as a CHIS, had not previously received credit for this, and was subject to a credible risk to life. A reduction of approximately 40% in sentence is appropriate.

Parties
Respondent: Rex; Appellant: AIB
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
21 November 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
Appeal against sentence allowed in part
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Informers, Reduction of Sentence
Criminal Law Sentencing Informers Reduction of Sentence

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 4
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Respondent

AIB

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether the sentencing judge gave sufficient regard to the appellant's role as a CHIS (Covert Human Intelligence Source) and the information provided when passing sentence
  2. 2 Whether a reduction in sentence was warranted based on the appellant's assistance to authorities

Ratio Decidendi

The judge erred in determining that the text did not assist the appellant; the appellant had provided significant assistance as a CHIS, had not previously received credit for this, and was subject to a credible risk to life. A reduction of approximately 40% in sentence is appropriate.

Court Disposition

Appeal against sentence allowed in part

Orders

  • Total sentence reduced to 60 months (5 years) imprisonment