Woodford v AIG Europe Ltd & Anor
There was no knowledge of alleged breaches of duty prior to 1 August 2015 attributable to the Policyholder or insured persons; AIG was not entitled to decline cover under SC5 or clause 5.5; the defence costs claimed are reasonable and recoverable under the Policy.
- Parties
- Claimant: Michael Woodford MBE; Claimant: Paul Hillman; Defendant: AIG Europe Limited; Defendant: KeyMed (Medical and Industrial Equipment) Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 March 2018
- Procedural Posture
- Commercial Insurance Dispute / Final Judgment After Trial
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Directors and Officers Insurance, Breach of Directors' Duties, Knowledge Attribution Under German Law, Obligation to Provide Information, Quantum of Defence Costs
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Michael Woodford MBE
Claimant
Paul Hillman
Claimant
AIG Europe Limited
Defendant
KeyMed (Medical and Industrial Equipment) Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Commercial Insurance Dispute / Final Judgment After Trial
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Policyholder or persons whose knowledge is attributable to the Policyholder had knowledge of alleged breaches of duty prior to 1 August 2015
- 2 Whether AIG is entitled to decline cover by reference to clause 5.5 of the Policy
- 3 Quantum of defence costs recoverable under the Policy
Ratio Decidendi
There was no knowledge of alleged breaches of duty prior to 1 August 2015 attributable to the Policyholder or insured persons; AIG was not entitled to decline cover under SC5 or clause 5.5; the defence costs claimed are reasonable and recoverable under the Policy.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- AIG to indemnify claimants for defence costs incurred to 31 December 2017: £2,318,053 for Mr Woodford and £1,773,223 for Mr Hillman
- Interest at German statutory rate of 4.12% per annum payable 14 days after expiry of demand
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment