Varano v Air Canada [2021] EWHC 1336 (QB) (17 May 2021)
Regulation 261 (as amended) applies to non-Community carriers operating flights departing from the UK under a single booking, and compensation is due for delays at the final destination, regardless of where the delay occurs. The contingent liability is imposed when the carrier operates the flight from the UK, and the principle of territoriality is not breached by quantifying compensation based on events outside the UK/EU. Existing CJEU and Court of Appeal authority is binding and directly answers the issues raised.
- Citation
- [2021] EWHC 1336
- Parties
- Claimant: Marjolyn Varano; Defendant: Air Canada
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 17 May 2021
- Procedural Posture
- Civil Claim for Flight Delay Compensation / High Court Judgment After Transfer From County Court
- Outcome
- Claim allowed
- Legal Topics
- Flight Delay Compensation, Jurisdiction of EU Regulations, Extraterritorial Application of Law, Interpretation of Regulation (ec) No 261/2004
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Marjolyn Varano
Claimant
Air Canada
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Civil Claim for Flight Delay Compensation / High Court Judgment After Transfer From County Court
Legal Issues
- 1 Does Regulation (EC) No 261/2004 apply to non-Community carriers for connecting flights departing from the UK with delays occurring outside the EU?
- 2 Is compensation under Article 7 of Regulation 261 due when the delay occurs on a non-EU leg of a journey booked as a single reservation with a non-Community carrier?
- 3 Does the principle of territoriality or international law preclude such application?
Ratio Decidendi
Regulation 261 (as amended) applies to non-Community carriers operating flights departing from the UK under a single booking, and compensation is due for delays at the final destination, regardless of where the delay occurs. The contingent liability is imposed when the carrier operates the flight from the UK, and the principle of territoriality is not breached by quantifying compensation based on events outside the UK/EU. Existing CJEU and Court of Appeal authority is binding and directly answers the issues raised.
Court Disposition
Claim allowed
Orders
- Air Canada to pay €600 compensation to the Claimant under Article 7 of Regulation 261
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment