Airwars v Information Commissioner & Anor
The entirety of the requested information is exempt under FOIA sections 23, 24, 26, 27, and 42. The aggregated public interest in maintaining these exemptions outweighs the public interest in disclosure. No information can be disaggregated for disclosure without prejudicing national security, defence, or international relations.
- Parties
- Appellant: Airwars; First Respondent: Information Commissioner; Second Respondent: Ministry of Defence
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 12 December 2025
- Procedural Posture
- FOIA Appeal / Final Judgment
- Outcome
- Appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Freedom of Information Act, Civilian Harm Assessment, Military Operations, Legal Professional Privilege, International Relations
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Airwars
Appellant
Information Commissioner
First Respondent
Ministry of Defence
Second Respondent
Procedural Posture
FOIA Appeal / Final Judgment
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether MOD is entitled to withhold documents assessing civilian harm under FOIA exemptions
- 2 Whether public interest in disclosure outweighs exemptions claimed under sections 23, 24, 26, 27, and 42
- 3 Whether any information can be disaggregated and disclosed
Ratio Decidendi
The entirety of the requested information is exempt under FOIA sections 23, 24, 26, 27, and 42. The aggregated public interest in maintaining these exemptions outweighs the public interest in disclosure. No information can be disaggregated for disclosure without prejudicing national security, defence, or international relations.
Court Disposition
Appeal dismissed
Orders
- No disclosure of requested information
- MOD entitled to mask applicable exemptions under sections 23 and 24
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment