Murray, R. v
The appellant's conviction for murder is unsafe due to overwhelming medical evidence of diminished responsibility and the effect of her mental illness on her plea; the conviction is quashed and substituted with manslaughter, and a Hospital Order with unlimited Restriction Order is imposed.
- Parties
- Appellant: Aisling Murray; Respondent: Regina (The Crown)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 July 2008
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
- Outcome
- appeal allowed; murder conviction quashed; manslaughter conviction substituted
- Legal Topics
- Diminished Responsibility, Fitness to Plead, Manslaughter, Murder, Hospital Order, Restriction Order
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Aisling Murray
Appellant
Regina (The Crown)
Respondent
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the appellant's conviction for murder should be quashed and replaced with manslaughter on grounds of diminished responsibility
- 2 Whether the appellant's plea of guilty to murder was affected by her mental condition
- 3 Appropriate disposal for a conviction of manslaughter by reason of diminished responsibility
Ratio Decidendi
The appellant's conviction for murder is unsafe due to overwhelming medical evidence of diminished responsibility and the effect of her mental illness on her plea; the conviction is quashed and substituted with manslaughter, and a Hospital Order with unlimited Restriction Order is imposed.
Court Disposition
appeal allowed; murder conviction quashed; manslaughter conviction substituted
Orders
- Hospital Order for detention at Edenfield Centre
- Restriction Order unlimited in time
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment