AFRICA FINANCE CORPORATION & Ors v AITEO EASTERN E & P COMPANY LIMITED
Substantial delay in seeking anti-suit injunction was reasonably explained by ongoing restructuring negotiations, and no progress was made in Nigerian proceedings on the merits during the delay. Lenders did not waive arbitration rights under Nigerian law by appealing. No strong reason exists to refuse anti-suit injunction; final relief granted. Grounds for setting aside interim injunction not sufficiently grave; ex parte procedure justified.
- Parties
- Claimant: Africa Finance Corporation; Claimant: Ecobank Nigeria Limited; Claimant: Fidelity Bank PLC; Claimant: First Bank of Nigeria Limited; Claimant: Guaranty Trust Bank PLC; Claimant: Shell Western Supply and Trading Limited; Claimant: Sterling Bank PLC; Claimant: Union Bank of Nigeria PLC; Claimant: Zenith Bank PLC; Defendant: Aiteo Eastern E & P Company Limited
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2022
- Procedural Posture
- Arbitration Claim / Final Determination of Anti Suit Injunction and Application to Set Aside Interim Injunction
- Outcome
- Final anti-suit injunction granted; application to set aside interim injunction refused.
- Legal Topics
- Anti Suit Injunctions, Arbitration Agreements, Delay in Seeking Relief, Waiver of Arbitration Rights, Comity, Jurisdiction Challenges
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Africa Finance Corporation
Claimant
Ecobank Nigeria Limited
Claimant
Fidelity Bank PLC
Claimant
First Bank of Nigeria Limited
Claimant
Guaranty Trust Bank PLC
Claimant
Shell Western Supply and Trading Limited
Claimant
Sterling Bank PLC
Claimant
Union Bank of Nigeria PLC
Claimant
Zenith Bank PLC
Claimant
Aiteo Eastern E & P Company Limited
Defendant
Procedural Posture
Arbitration Claim / Final Determination of Anti Suit Injunction and Application to Set Aside Interim Injunction
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether delay in seeking anti-suit injunction constitutes strong reason to refuse relief
- 2 Whether Lenders waived arbitration rights by appealing in Nigerian courts
- 3 Whether anti-suit injunction should be granted to enforce arbitration agreements
Ratio Decidendi
Substantial delay in seeking anti-suit injunction was reasonably explained by ongoing restructuring negotiations, and no progress was made in Nigerian proceedings on the merits during the delay. Lenders did not waive arbitration rights under Nigerian law by appealing. No strong reason exists to refuse anti-suit injunction; final relief granted. Grounds for setting aside interim injunction not sufficiently grave; ex parte procedure justified.
Court Disposition
Final anti-suit injunction granted; application to set aside interim injunction refused.
Orders
- Defendant restrained from continuing Nigerian FHC Proceedings and from bringing claims arising out of Facility Agreements in any forum other than London-seated ICC arbitration.
- Declaratory relief granted confirming arbitration agreements.
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment