AJ v JJ & Ors
The appeal was allowed because the trial judge failed to make a clear finding on the children's objections to return, which was the primary issue, and did not properly exercise discretion under Article 13 of the Hague Convention. The case was remitted for a rehearing with directions to expedite proceedings and ensure the children are properly engaged and informed.
- Parties
- Appellant: AJ; 1st Respondent: JJ; Interveners: KJ, JAJ, JUJ (by their solicitor NH)
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 02 December 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Family Law Child Abduction / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
- Outcome
- Appeal allowed; case remitted for rehearing
- Legal Topics
- Child Abduction, Hague Convention 1980, Children's Objections, Return Orders, Brussels II Revised
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
AJ
Appellant
JJ
1st Respondent
KJ, JAJ, JUJ (by their solicitor NH)
Interveners
Procedural Posture
Family Law Child Abduction / Appeal From High Court to Court of Appeal
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the trial judge erred in failing to make a clear finding on the children's objections to return under the Hague Convention
- 2 Whether the judge should have ordered separate representation for the children or met with them directly
- 3 Proper exercise of judicial discretion under Article 13 of the Hague Convention
Ratio Decidendi
The appeal was allowed because the trial judge failed to make a clear finding on the children's objections to return, which was the primary issue, and did not properly exercise discretion under Article 13 of the Hague Convention. The case was remitted for a rehearing with directions to expedite proceedings and ensure the children are properly engaged and informed.
Court Disposition
Appeal allowed; case remitted for rehearing
Orders
- Remitted hearing to be listed in the week commencing 5 December
- Remitted hearing to be conducted without further oral evidence
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment