R v AJF

R v AJF

The CCRC investigation found no evidence of jury bias or irregularity. The applicant's complaints did not meet the threshold for further inquiry, and there was no arguable basis to consider the convictions unsafe.

Parties
Applicant: AJF; Respondent: Rex
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
03 December 2025
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction
Outcome
application for leave to appeal against conviction refused
Legal Topics
Jury Irregularity, Sexual Offences, Appeal Procedure, Jury Bias, Post Trial Investigation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 5 Party arguments 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

AJF

Applicant

Rex

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Application for Leave to Appeal Against Conviction

  1. 1 Whether post-trial allegations of jury irregularity and bias warranted further investigation and undermined the safety of the conviction

Ratio Decidendi

The CCRC investigation found no evidence of jury bias or irregularity. The applicant's complaints did not meet the threshold for further inquiry, and there was no arguable basis to consider the convictions unsafe.

Court Disposition

application for leave to appeal against conviction refused