Singh, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 556 (23 April 2024)
The applicant's leading role in a large-scale, organised operation involving vast quantities of prescription drugs, combined with prior similar convictions, justified the sentence imposed; mitigation and credit for guilty plea were properly applied; the sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2024] EWCA Crim 556
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Ajmer Singh
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 23 April 2024
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Drug Offences, Appeals
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Ajmer Singh
Applicant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
- 2 Whether the applicant's role was leading or significant
- 3 Whether sufficient mitigation was applied
Ratio Decidendi
The applicant's leading role in a large-scale, organised operation involving vast quantities of prescription drugs, combined with prior similar convictions, justified the sentence imposed; mitigation and credit for guilty plea were properly applied; the sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.
Court Disposition
renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment