Singh, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 556 (23 April 2024)

Singh, R. v [2024] EWCA Crim 556 (23 April 2024)

The applicant's leading role in a large-scale, organised operation involving vast quantities of prescription drugs, combined with prior similar convictions, justified the sentence imposed; mitigation and credit for guilty plea were properly applied; the sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.

Source-derived case information.

Citation
[2024] EWCA Crim 556
Parties
Prosecution: Rex; Applicant: Ajmer Singh
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
23 April 2024
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome
renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused
Legal Topics
Sentencing, Drug Offences, Appeals
Criminal Law Sentencing Drug Offences Appeals

Source-derived case record

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 2 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 12
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Rex

Prosecution

Ajmer Singh

Applicant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Renewed Application for Leave to Appeal Against Sentence

  1. 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive or wrong in principle
  2. 2 Whether the applicant's role was leading or significant
  3. 3 Whether sufficient mitigation was applied

Ratio Decidendi

The applicant's leading role in a large-scale, organised operation involving vast quantities of prescription drugs, combined with prior similar convictions, justified the sentence imposed; mitigation and credit for guilty plea were properly applied; the sentence was not manifestly excessive or wrong in principle.

Court Disposition

renewed application for leave to appeal against sentence refused