R v Akbat Arbati

The sentence imposed was manifestly excessive; a proportionate sentence reflecting aggravating and mitigating features should have been 16 months after credit for plea.

Parties: Prosecutor: Rex; Appellant: Akbat Arbati
Jurisdiction: England and Wales
Judgment Date: 13 November 2024
Procedural Posture: Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Outcome: appeal allowed
Legal Topics: Sentencing, Illegal Entry, Deportation Orders, Credit for Guilty Plea

Criminal Law Immigration Law Sentencing Illegal Entry Deportation Orders Credit for Guilty Plea

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 6 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 5

Parties

Rex

Prosecutor

Akbat Arbati

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence

Legal Issues

1 Whether the sentence for knowingly attempting to arrive in the United Kingdom without valid entry clearance was manifestly excessive
2 Appropriate application of aggravating and mitigating factors in sentencing

Ratio Decidendi

The sentence imposed was manifestly excessive; a proportionate sentence reflecting aggravating and mitigating features should have been 16 months after credit for plea.

Court Disposition

appeal allowed

Orders

Sentence reduced from two years' imprisonment to 16 months' imprisonment