Akhmedova v Akhmedov & Ors

Akhmedova v Akhmedov & Ors

The issue of the appropriateness of the search order and related costs is adjourned to trial to ensure fairness and allow Temur Akhmedov opportunity to address the propriety and his litigation conduct.

Parties
Claimant: Akhmedova; Defendant: Akhmedov & Ors; Tenth Respondent: Temur Akhmedov; Eighth Respondent: Eighth Respondent; Ninth Respondent: Ninth Respondent; Eleventh Respondent: Eleventh Respondent
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
04 November 2020
Procedural Posture
Family Division / Return Date of Search and Forensic Imaging Order
Outcome
Adjourned to trial date for consideration of search order propriety and costs.
Legal Topics
Search Orders, Disclosure, Costs, Forensic Imaging, Litigation Conduct

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 2 Authorities cited 1 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 3
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Akhmedova

Claimant

Akhmedov & Ors

Defendant

Temur Akhmedov

Tenth Respondent

Eighth Respondent

Eighth Respondent

Ninth Respondent

Ninth Respondent

Eleventh Respondent

Eleventh Respondent

Procedural Posture

Family Division / Return Date of Search and Forensic Imaging Order

  1. 1 Whether the search order was properly executed
  2. 2 Whether Temur Akhmedov breached disclosure obligations
  3. 3 Appropriateness of granting the search order

Ratio Decidendi

The issue of the appropriateness of the search order and related costs is adjourned to trial to ensure fairness and allow Temur Akhmedov opportunity to address the propriety and his litigation conduct.

Court Disposition

Adjourned to trial date for consideration of search order propriety and costs.

Orders

  • Ring-fence costs relating to search order application and execution up to and including today.
  • Ring-fence costs of disclosure process approved today.