Halim, R v

Halim, R v

The ruling made on 12 November 2015 was wrong because the judge failed to properly consider all circumstances, including delays caused by the defence, and did not adopt the broad approach to 'exceptional circumstances' required by precedent. The prosecution was not at fault for delays up to the expiry of the two-year limit, and any prejudice to the defence could have been addressed by costs orders.

Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Respondent: Akim Halim
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
10 February 2017
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment
Outcome
Appeal allowed
Legal Topics
Confiscation Order, Exceptional Circumstances, Timetabling, Postponement, Statutory Interpretation
Criminal Law Proceeds of Crime Confiscation Order Exceptional Circumstances Timetabling Postponement Statutory Interpretation

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 2
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Akim Halim

Respondent

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal Judgment

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether there were exceptional circumstances to extend the two-year time limit for making a confiscation order under s.14 of POCA
  2. 2 Whether delays caused by the defence justify retrospective extension of the time limit
  3. 3 Whether prosecution failures amount to exceptional circumstances

Ratio Decidendi

The ruling made on 12 November 2015 was wrong because the judge failed to properly consider all circumstances, including delays caused by the defence, and did not adopt the broad approach to 'exceptional circumstances' required by precedent. The prosecution was not at fault for delays up to the expiry of the two-year limit, and any prejudice to the defence could have been addressed by costs orders.

Court Disposition

Appeal allowed

Orders

  • Crown Court to proceed afresh under s.6 of POCA