Miah, R. v [2025] EWCA Crim 1784 (16 December 2025)
The sentence imposed, including the uplift for totality and aggravating factors, was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness, multiplicity, and context of the offences. The judge correctly applied the Sentencing Council guidelines, gave appropriate credit for plea and mitigation, and the extended licence period was justified for public protection.
- Citation
- [2025] EWCA Crim 1784
- Parties
- Prosecution: Rex; Appellant: Akram Miah
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 16 December 2025
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Sentencing, Domestic Violence, Wounding With Intent, Coercive and Controlling Behaviour, Threats to Kill, Criminal Damage
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Rex
Prosecution
Akram Miah
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the sentence imposed was manifestly excessive for the offences committed
- 2 Whether the uplift for totality and aggravating factors was justified
- 3 Whether sufficient weight was given to mitigation including mental health and remorse
Ratio Decidendi
The sentence imposed, including the uplift for totality and aggravating factors, was not manifestly excessive given the seriousness, multiplicity, and context of the offences. The judge correctly applied the Sentencing Council guidelines, gave appropriate credit for plea and mitigation, and the extended licence period was justified for public protection.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Appeal against sentence dismissed
- Indefinite restraining order confirmed
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment