Austin & Anor, R v [2011] EWCA Crim 345 (24 February 2011)
The court held that the Crown was entitled to adduce evidence implicating Everett as a co-conspirator in the retrial, despite his acquittal in the first trial, as there was substantial evidence of his involvement and no unfairness or abuse of process arose. The acquittal only barred Everett's retrial, not the...
Source-derived case information.
- Citation
- [2011] EWCA Crim 345
- Parties
- Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Alan Brian Austin; Appellant: Ali Tavakolinia
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 24 February 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
- Outcome
- appeal dismissed
- Legal Topics
- Conspiracy, Admissibility of Evidence, Acquittal, Fair Trial, European Convention on Human Rights
Source-derived case record
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Regina
Respondent
Alan Brian Austin
Appellant
Ali Tavakolinia
Appellant
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether evidence relating to a co-conspirator acquitted in a prior trial can be admitted against remaining defendants in a retrial
- 2 Whether the retrial and admission of such evidence violates fairness or ECHR rights
Ratio Decidendi
The court held that the Crown was entitled to adduce evidence implicating Everett as a co-conspirator in the retrial, despite his acquittal in the first trial, as there was substantial evidence of his involvement and no unfairness or abuse of process arose. The acquittal only barred Everett's retrial, not the assertion of his participation in the conspiracy against other defendants.
Court Disposition
appeal dismissed
Orders
- Leave to appeal against conviction refused
- Leave to appeal against sentence refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment