Austin & Anor, R v

Austin & Anor, R v

The court held that the acquittal of Everett in the first trial did not prevent the Crown from adducing evidence of his participation in the conspiracy in the second trial against Austin and Tavakolinia. There was no unfairness or abuse of process, and the convictions were safe based on the evidence. The sentences imposed were justified and not manifestly excessive.

Parties
Respondent: Regina; Appellant: Alan Brian Austin; Appellant: Ali Tavakolinia
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
24 February 2011
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
appeal dismissed
Legal Topics
Conspiracy, Admissibility of Evidence, Acquittal, Fair Trial, Sentence Appeal
Criminal Law Conspiracy Admissibility of Evidence Acquittal Fair Trial Sentence Appeal

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 3 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 7
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Respondent

Alan Brian Austin

Appellant

Ali Tavakolinia

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Judgment on Appeal Against Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether evidence relating to an acquitted co-conspirator (Everett) could be admitted in a subsequent trial of other alleged conspirators
  2. 2 Whether the judge in the second trial erred in allowing such evidence
  3. 3 Whether the convictions of Austin and Tavakolinia were safe

Ratio Decidendi

The court held that the acquittal of Everett in the first trial did not prevent the Crown from adducing evidence of his participation in the conspiracy in the second trial against Austin and Tavakolinia. There was no unfairness or abuse of process, and the convictions were safe based on the evidence. The sentences imposed were justified and not manifestly excessive.

Court Disposition

appeal dismissed

Orders

  • Leave to appeal against conviction refused.
  • Leave to appeal against sentence refused.