Chater, R (on the application of) v Parole Board & Anor
The Parole Board was entitled to refuse release based on further risk assessments and the appellant's response to interventions in custody; the submission that more tangible evidence is required beyond further assessment is not arguable.
- Parties
- Appellant: Alan Chater; Respondent: Parole Board; Interested Party: Secretary of State for Justice
- Jurisdiction
- England and Wales
- Judgment Date
- 01 April 2011
- Procedural Posture
- Judicial Review / Application for Leave to Appeal (renewed Oral Application)
- Outcome
- renewed application for leave to appeal refused
- Legal Topics
- Parole, Extended Sentence, Risk Assessment, Judicial Review, Continued Detention, Article 5 ECHR
Case Brief
Summary, issues, holding and outcome
More case intelligence is available
Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.
Parties
Alan Chater
Appellant
Parole Board
Respondent
Secretary of State for Justice
Interested Party
Procedural Posture
Judicial Review / Application for Leave to Appeal (renewed Oral Application)
Legal Issues
- 1 Whether the Parole Board applied the correct legal test for continued detention of the appellant.
- 2 Whether continued detention can be based on the same or similar material as the sentencing judge relied upon.
- 3 Whether a further risk assessment alone is sufficient to justify continued detention.
Ratio Decidendi
The Parole Board was entitled to refuse release based on further risk assessments and the appellant's response to interventions in custody; the submission that more tangible evidence is required beyond further assessment is not arguable.
Court Disposition
renewed application for leave to appeal refused
Full Case Text
Judgment text and source record
Sign in to read
Sign in to read the full judgment text
Sign in to read the full judgment text. Downloads and additional research tools may depend on your plan.
Sign in to read the full judgment