MccArtney & Ors, R. v [2003] EWCA Crim 1372 (16 May 2003)

MccArtney & Ors, R. v [2003] EWCA Crim 1372 (16 May 2003)

The convictions were not rendered unsafe by the reliance on Lally's evidence, as his credibility was fully explored before the jury, and the undisclosed material would not have materially affected the outcome. The judge's directions on adverse inferences and identification were adequate. There was no undue disparity in sentencing. The appeals against conviction and sentence are dismissed.

Citation
[2003] EWCA Crim 1372
Parties
Prosecution: Regina; Appellant: Alan Michael McCartney; Appellant: Peter John Hamlett; Appellant: Lee Beddow; Appellant: Michael David Hulme
Jurisdiction
England and Wales
Judgment Date
16 May 2003
Procedural Posture
Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal (criminal Division) Judgment on Conviction and Sentence
Outcome
Appeals against conviction and sentence dismissed.
Legal Topics
Conspiracy to Rob, Evidential Reliability, Disclosure Obligations, Adverse Inferences, Jury Directions, Participating Informant, Sentence Disparity
Criminal Law Conspiracy to Rob Evidential Reliability Disclosure Obligations Adverse Inferences Jury Directions Participating Informant Sentence Disparity

Case Brief

Summary, issues, holding and outcome

More case intelligence is available

Unlock the full research layer for this judgment.

Full judgment text Downloadable case file Legal principles 4 Authorities cited 7 Party arguments 2 Amounts and remedies 18
Sign in to unlock

Parties

Regina

Prosecution

Alan Michael McCartney

Appellant

Peter John Hamlett

Appellant

Lee Beddow

Appellant

Michael David Hulme

Appellant

Procedural Posture

Criminal Appeal / Court of Appeal (criminal Division) Judgment on Conviction and Sentence

Legal Issues

  1. 1 Whether convictions were unsafe due to reliance on uncorroborated evidence of Raymond Lally
  2. 2 Whether late or non-disclosure by the Crown rendered the trial unfair
  3. 3 Whether the judge erred in jury directions regarding adverse inferences and identification

Ratio Decidendi

The convictions were not rendered unsafe by the reliance on Lally's evidence, as his credibility was fully explored before the jury, and the undisclosed material would not have materially affected the outcome. The judge's directions on adverse inferences and identification were adequate. There was no undue disparity in sentencing. The appeals against conviction and sentence are dismissed.

Court Disposition

Appeals against conviction and sentence dismissed.